The human mind remains one of the most elusive and mysterious entities in the world. Despite the tremendous gains made in our understanding of mental health and the careful codification of mental states through the DSM, there remain significant gaps in the way we conceptualize psychological well-being and treat mental illness. This may be particularly true for bipolar disorder.
Bipolar disorder is often considered by many outside observers to be one of the most straightforward of mental illnesses, characterized by extreme mood swings that disrupt normal function and impair quality of life. While it is true that most forms of bipolar disorder are classified according to strict diagnostic criteria, it is also true that the experiences of many people with these conditions expand beyond current clinical definitions. Indeed, there is an entire bipolar diagnosis subtype defined by its lack of adherence to standard bipolar symptoms, referred to as bipolar disorder not-otherwise-specific (NOS). As Natasha Tracy writes:
It is understood in diagnostic circles that sometimes bipolar disorder can present with symptoms outside the norm and yet still be classified as bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder NOS is a bipolar condition that does not neatly fit into the symptomology of bipolar I or bipolar II.
But new research is indicating that even bipolar subtypes with well-defined diagnostic criteria may, in fact, be more complex than previously assumed, opening up the door to new bipolar disorder treatments.



